The drive to tackle the injustice facing Britain’s ‘WASPI ladies’


By Clair Ramage

I am sometimes asked why did you stand as a councillor? The answer can be very simple, “Because I was asked to”. However, there is obviously more to it than that. Having taught for 34 years at Hawick High School I was approaching retirement and wrote to the Department of Works and Pensions to apply for my State Pension.

Clair Ramage

The reply shocked and outraged me as I was informed that I would have to wait a further six years for my State Pension. I had paid into a system for 40 years and the contract was being ripped up by the government. I started to contact other women who found themselves in the same position as myself and as a consequence I became co-coordinator of the Scottish Borders WASPI group, Women Against State Pension Inequality. This has brought together thousands of women from across Britain affected by these changes and many are living in extreme hardship. These women worked hard, raised families and paid their tax and national insurance with the expectation that they would be financially secure when reaching sixty.

It is not the pension age itself that is in dispute. It is widely accepted that women and men should retire at the same time. The issue is that the rise in the women’s state pension age has been too rapid and has happened without sufficient, or in most cases any, notice being given to the women affected, leaving women with no time to make alternative arrangements.

I started to receive letters from ladies in our region telling me about the difficult situations that they were living in. Their retirement plans shattered with devastating consequences. Many of these ladies are already out of the labour market, caring for elderly relatives, providing childcare for grandchildren, or suffering discrimination in the workplace in a struggle to find employment. They may even be told to apply for job seekers allowance, which offers a six week reprieve.

The most recent slap in the face was the Pensions Minister, Guy Oppenheim, who suggested that the women affected could apply for apprenticeships until they reached their new retirement date. I contacted our local MSP at the time (now current MP John Lamont) to be told that it was a Westminster policy and he could not get involved, but to contact Roz Altmann who was the Pension Minister at the time. He further commented that we had however been dropped off a cliff, as far as the State Pension was concerned.

Dr Ros Altmann former pension minister

Dr Altmann’s reply to my enquiry was very interesting as she accused me of not informing the DWP of a change in address and that women had been given plenty of warning. I have been at the same address for twenty seven years and have received other notifications from the DWP. So go figure!

This is when I became more politically aware and very angry. At this time Boris Johnson was wanting to spend billions on his vanity project – a garden bridge across the Thames, “which would be good for Britain” said Joanna Lumley, a project that has since been dropped at a cost of £45million to us the tax payers. A fast train through Birmingham to London, a luxury £44,000 bathroom for Jeremy Hunt, to say nothing of Trident or £3billion on a new aircraft carrier, with no aircraft etc. and suddenly I could see what my pension was going to be spent on.

I then approached my then MP, Calum Kerr, who wholeheartedly supported the WASPI ladies plight. He brought us together with 7000 other women to Westminster, in order to demonstrate against this policy. As a result a cross group of MPs was set up; including many Tory backbenchers.

I continued to write letters of complaint to the DWP, Theresa May, George Osborne and my MSP and I continued to get back benign letters of platitude. I set up a couple of petition signing sessions at Morrisons in Hawick to let ladies know that they were not alone dealing with this issue. Roz Altmann then resigned her post as Pension Secretary and announced that in fact the women born in the 50s had been treated unfairly but that she couldn’t say anything as her “hands had been tied by Ian Duncan Smith”.

It was around this time that I was asked if I would stand as a councillor, and inspired by Angela Davis “to no longer accept the things I cannot change but to change the things I cannot accept,” I decided I would like to be involved in local politics.

I started to knock on doors and talk to people about various issues, one being the State Pension crisis. I came across some ladies who were quite happy as they were getting their Pension and did not want to support their fellow ladies who were not, some even expressed the view that the Scottish Parliament should mitigate the changes to State Pensions, another said to me ‘hard cheese ᾽cause I get mine’. We seem to be living in a society where ‘ I’m alright Jock’ seems to be the views of a few.

Margaret Thatcher is quoted as saying ‘there is no such thing as a society’. That is not a world that I want my children or grandchildren to inherit.

Our new MP, John Lamont, stated, at one of the recent General Election hustings, that it was his intent to support ‘people over policy’. I contacted him when he was elected to garner support and his reply shocked and again angered me. “I will not go against my Government”. He then stated that he has been giving the WASPI ladies, in his constituency, support.

I asked him in what way and his reply was, “I ask them to lobby the Scottish Parliament”. He obviously doesn’t understand that this is a a reserved Westminster policy that cannot be mitigated by the Scottish Government. The only relief that the Scottish Government can offer is Job Seekers allowance for six weeks!

I am fed up with the lies that are continually peddled. Our MPs should be supporting their constituents and understand that 5000 ladies in this constituency [Berwickshire Roxburgh and Selkirk] will be watching with bated breath.

If you are keen to join WASPI contact<>

Clair has organised a meeting for WASPI ladies in the Scottish Borders on Sunday 11th February,10.30am – 12.30pm at the Sprouston Room, Newtown Community Wing, Newtown St Boswells. If this draconian policy affects you or someone you know please come along.

This article first appeared in Border Patrol and is published on Newsnet thanks to the agreement of Councillor Clair Ramage and Dorothy Bruce, Editor of Border Patrol. A full copy of this issue of Border Patrol can be downloaded at You can sign up to receive future issues by registering on the website.


  1. He obviously doesn’t understand that this is a a reserved Westminster policy that cannot be mitigated by the Scottish Government. The only relief that the Scottish Government can offer is Job Seekers allowance for six weeks!
    I am fed up with the lies that are continually peddled. Our MPs should be supporting their constituents and understand that 5000 ladies in this constituency [Berwickshire Roxburgh and Selkirk] will be watching with bated breath.

    I’ll be honest, I’m a bit fed up with peddled lies too!
    Quite apart from whether one agrees with the way the pension changes have been implemented or not (and I personally think that the notification time should have been much longer), it is arguably important to at least be accurate about what can and cannot be done, and by whom.
    Ther is an argument that this is a mess that the UK government has created and if it is to be cleaned up then it should be the UK government that should do it, it is not the Scottish Government’s responsibility. The Scottish Government is clearly in agreement with that argument, however rather than admit it the SNP have worked hard to give everyone the impression that there is little or nothing they can do about it, their hands are tied, they’d love to help but can’t. Of course they’ve been very careful how they’ve said it.

    The official SNP line is that: “In government, we will always use the powers at our disposal to protect the poorest in our society and mitigate the worst excess of the Tory government. However, with the limited social security powers devolved to Scotland, the Scottish Parliament does not have the power to create new pension benefits. The SNP will continue to fight for the UK Government to take responsibility, deliver the pension that women born in the 1950s deserve and end this inequality at source. ” ( )

    They rightly say that the UK government should take responsibility, and they correctly say that they cannot create new pension benefits. So that’s it then, pack up and go home, nothing to see here, poor helpless Scottish Government… Well…. what they don’t say is they are completely free to create other (non pension) benefits that could be engineered to apply to these women and that would effectively replace their missing pension wholly or partly. Of course if they admitted that then they’d have to explain why they don’t do it.
    There are is no doubt that arguments exist as to why SG shouldn’t pay out a replacement for these women’s pensions; for example, we have a huge spending deficit and essentially can’t afford it (although that’s basically the logic the UK gov applied when it made the changes…). Or they could admit that WASPI issues aren’t top of the political priority list, and that throwing hundreds of millions of pounds at WASPI women might alienate a significant chunk of the electorate who have their own but different pension and retirement woes. Those would at least be honest arguments to not provide assistance, but instead the SNP have chosen to hide behind the lie that somehow they can’t help.

    Much more detail on this and the SNP’s cover-up can be read here:
    Yes the exensive FOI campaign that revealed their duplicity was orchestrated by a unionist blogger and for some that’ll no doubt have them decrying it, but realistically who else would put the effort in to expose SNP lies? Most of their supporters would rather close their eyes and ears and pretend otherwise

    My post is not about whether it is right that these women are in this position, or that the SG should do something to help, it is merely about the misleading decepetion that they couldn’t do something even if they wanted to.
    The SNP are at it on this topic, the irony is they could just tell the truth, answers on a postcar why they don’t…..

  2. We welcome all comments to our articles.
    However, please note that our anti-spam system doesn’t like messages that use more than one external links, and quarantines such messages until they are checked and approved by an administrator (or editor). Although we endeavour to respond quickly, this can lead to slight delays.

  3. Netgear Inc. is a global computer networking company which produces networking hardware for consumers, businesses, and service providers. Netgear was one of the first to introduce wireless router and since then it is evolving fast.(844) 456-8733 (US/CA)

  4. Roku provides the simplest solution to all your entertainment requirements. If you are game enthusiasts or like to binge watch TV series or movie, Roku is there for you. It is undoubtedly number one choice for entertainment seekers. With the wide range of top channels associated with the company like HBO, Netflix, BBC, youTube, HULU and many more, Roku showcase company’s ability to provide high-quality content. It is also very easy to use and activate, and anybody can do that easily, which probably is the reason why you came here. (844) 456-8733 (US/CA)

  5. Our technical experts will offer you the help to download, install and reinstall the McAfee product on your system. McAfee also provides the support to resolve the key related errors as well as the issues related to system performance.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here