Why I wouldn’t have voted for Pete Wishart 


Iain Bruce takes issue with a Westminster SNP MP’s position on the next independence campaign.

It is generally agreed that as Chair of the Scottish Select Committee and shadow SNP Shadow Leader of the house he has done a decent job but he’s not a Moses apprentice with all the responsibilities of helping to lead his people to the promised land. That has to be a job for others.

Such is the seductive absorption of the “westmonster” system over his 17 years career, his cautious attitude is clearly that incubated in the Westminster bubble. And since the debacle of the 2016 election his focus might appear to be survival and how to safeguard his slim 21 majority by trying to be all things to his electorate in the Perthshire heartlands, all the time forgetting that his job at Westminster should have been a temporary contract and not one to be attached to.

What were the great events in Scottish history that we’re the better for having consulted the runes and waited until they showed the most propitious time for action? Opinion polls? Well David Cameron bet his country on the fact that the polls were propitious for a Remain result, only it wasn’t to be because the Brexiteers had a more passionate if deceitful campaign.

The British state is in its death throes, being torn apart by self-interested cabals of the Conservative and Unionist party with no regard to the greater good of the one nation they regularly extol.

Scotland needs to get out of this abusive relationship now and do it without regard to opinion polls but to the well-being of current and future generations.

Theresa May’s speech to Scottish Conservative party conference in Glasgow in March last year and her first as PM gave early notice of the interests of the British state.

“We should never be shy of making that positive case for the Union” and she went on to enlist the virtues of greater economic strength and security which come from being united; “the fundamental strength of being one people”. But crucially “our wholly integrated domestic market for businesses means no barriers to trade within our borders”. All standard fare for a unionist politician until you look at the obverse of the coin and the continuing perfidy of Albion in its pursuit of self interest.

In other words a single UK market, all the better to flog off our NHS, privatise our water, let her Ineos pals frack our pleasant land as they would please.

UK single market? Ah well that was the M&S oops moment with their idea of British whisky, there’s a plethora of fruit and veg grown in the fertile Scottish countryside and stamped with the Union Jack on the supermarket shelves.

Mundell may be telling the truth about repatriating EU powers to Scotland but conveniently omits to identify their destination as the new Viceroy’s office in the enlarged Scottish Office he’s currently recruiting for in Leith. So in perfidy speak, yes EU powers of devolved competency are returning to Scotland, just not to the parliament of Scotland’s people at Holyrood.

Ever since the infamous Vow, it’s difficult to be polite about their idea of equal partners and the benefits of being one people…my a**e.

At a time when Scotland had 56 SNP MPs in the English parliament courtesy of the ’15 landslide, this was still insufficient to get any amendments adopted to the Scotland Bill. And oh, more frigates anyone?

Despite all its flaws, I wish to retain my citizenship of the EU and it’s a democratic obscenity for the English parliament to withdraw that.

We are in the end game of the United Kingdom and Pete Wishart might just be too close to the epicentre to see it but he certainly needs to wake up and smell the coffee.

In the same time frame as Brexit rushes to its absurd conclusion, that place on the banks of the Thames will commit our hard cash to renewing the obscenity of Trident despite all the opposition in Scotland, and Scotland’s MPs, those that want to that is, are powerless to do anything about it and couldn’t even when we had 56 SNP MPs. I never previously thought that civil disobedience might be the only alternative.

The fishermen of Moray and the North East and the triumph of international opportunities offered by messrs Fox, Gove and their merry band of brexiteers are being fooled just like they were when Ted Heath sold them out as pawns in his EEC negotiations and the interests of the City of London are far greater now than they were way back then.

And please let’s not look the other way at Mundell’s calculated insult with his “is there?, isn’t there? oh yes there is”, a Brexit economic impact study for Scotland that you can only see even numbered pages if you make an appointment.

May’s contemptible indifference to the National Bank, otherwise known as RBS, being allowed to walk away from commitments to rural communities and to leave them without the essential economic infrastructure in fragile rural areas, says so much about “The broad shoulders of the world’s fifth- largest economy provide enviable security for businesses and workers alike.”

No Pete, just as well you’re not standing for the SNP Deputy position, we don’t “have work to do in convincing our fellow Scots who voted No last time to join us as well as uniting all Scots from both sides of the EU referendum.” We only need to convince enough of them to look after their self interest as the English parliament has given us more than sufficient evidence that we don’t belong in the UK any more.”

The SNP need to ditch their managerial outlook and have the courage of their convictions.




  1. “The SNP need to ditch their managerial outlook and have the courage of their convictions.”
    Nicely summed up in that final sentence. I remain an SNP member for the time being at least, but I think time will run out for the party if it cant finally deliver on its reason for being, sooner rather than later. We are reaching our now or never moment, lets get emotional.

  2. Westminster are backing the Scot Gov. into a corner re Brexit and Indy Ref2. Is Westminster forcing the FM’s hand to hold Indy Ref2 before the Full Brexit disaster unfolds, before opinion has been moved in our favour. The current political instability has not swung opinion towards a YES vote.

    • The only people forcing the FM’s hand are those activists that keep banging on about indy ref two NOW, eventually she will have to give in to them, it will be pure lottery if that is the right time. If I were a nationalist (and I’m not) then I would want to wait until brexit was done and dusted and working or not before deciding what the best strategy is. A bad brexit (hard) plays into the ‘ look what they’ve done’ let’s get out now approach (ie the ususl mantra), a good brexit (ie very good low friction trade with EU in goods and services and cooperative institutions) also favours an indy ref campaign as it means one of the most important issues for many i.e. The post indy trade relationship is either sorted or at least provenly achievable. Waiting also allows Scots to weigh up their options with slightly more knowledge, not that many proponents of indy ref two actually want that since they adhere to an idealogical position based primarily on emotion and history rather than a rational asessment of the options. And by that I mean they have already determined what the right course is, any facts or realities are either useful to that or to be ignored so from that point of view they can have a vote anytime, but for the rest of us, we want to know what we’re letting ourselves in for. I think brexit will show that voting for huge constitutional and economic change doesn’t always end up how you thought it would, people might be all the more wary about voting for another huge change particularly now that we’ve had a decade or more of the SNP running things and it appears they aren’t actually any better at it than anyone else. All politicians are selling something they, for the most part, can’t deliver well, and nationalist ones are no different; you just have to hope the majority forget that one more time despite all the evidence. Would I want Sturgeon and her pals in charge of setting up the infrastructure of a new state? Not really, what we have now is not perfect, it has many flaws but on the whole It is preferable to the unknown that she and her mates might cobble together

  3. Alistair, I’ve been emotional since our 1979 51.62% YES vote and as time passes I find I’m becoming a wee bit more “emotional”, if ye catch ma drift 🙁

  4. People keep going on about these opinion polls for goodness sake use your brains they are only the opinions of the people they ask and they never tell you how many they ask or where they were asked the whole thing is a fraud they make out the opinions of their polls represent the whole of the country 62 million people ??? They try to lnfluence the gullable to believe that that proves their point they should be made illegal for the fraud behind,their purpose the only true poll is a referendum no other

  5. The emotionality of political Anoraks (mines is a parka) isn’t shared by the public. Yet.
    Holding the referendum too early is a trap engineered by the Tories.
    Yeah emotion is good, walking into a Tory trap, nah count me out!

  6. I live in a small rural perthshire village and pin my SNP COLOURS to the mast each election despite the opprobrium of the local Scots Tories and English incomers. Why should I court this ire without the succour of a fresh Independence referendum. I’m not doing this to keep Wishart in a job post Run rig.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here