UK Government lobbied US to back Scottish No campaign

5
6769

By Newsnet.scot Reporter

The extent of UK Government attempts to pressure the United States to intervene on the side of the No campaign in last year’s Scottish referendum has been revealed by a Sunday newspaper today.

The Scottish Sunday Express – a No supporting title – obtained what it describes as “a cache” of US State Department documents, after three years of inquiries using US freedom of information legislation.

The files confirm that the US has tracked the independence debate ever since the SNP first formed a government at Holyrood in 2007.

They reveal extensive UK Government lobbying, led by the Scotland Office, as Whitehall became increasingly desperate to persuade foreign governments to condemn Scottish independence. The US was the number one target for the campaign.

Stiglitz: Nobel Prize winner and Scottish Government adviser

The files also reveal that US officials monitored US citizens who spoke in favour of independence. These included Professor David Scheffer, who gave a pro Yes speech in Glasgow,  and Professor Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize winner who advised the Scottish Government on economic matters.

Today, the role of the Scotland Office particularly was condemned by the SNP.

The party’s foreign affairs spokesman, Angus Robertson MP, said: “It is shameful that Westminster’s Scotland Office was desperately briefing The White House against Scottish independence during the referendum campaign.

“It is also somewhat unsettling that the UK government were briefing The White House about US citizens like Joseph Stiglitz and others who were involved in Scotland’s biggest ever democratic exercise.”

US State Department papers describe former First Minister Alex Salmond as “a breath of fresh air” but note his “anti-war” policies. New FM Nicola Sturgeon is described as a “forceful politician”.

The department’s central foreign policy division traced 60 documents as a result of the Sunday Express inquiries, but only 22 have been released in full. A further 19 had some sections redacted, with 14 “kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy”, and another five still under review.

The files kept secret most likely relate to the fate of Trident and the SNP debate over an independent Scotland’s NATO membership – both key issues to what the US perceives as its own national interest.

One briefing dated February 15 2013 reveals details of a meeting between Marisa Plowden, head of internal politics at the US Embassy in London, and an anonymous official of the Scotland Office who wanted to discuss a Whitehall report on the implications of independence.

Chris Flatt, Scotland Office
Chris Flatt, Scotland Office high flier

It is likely that the Scotland Office official will have been Chris Flatt (right), who served as Deputy Director, Constitution and International Affairs, at the department from 2010 until the referendum, or members of his team. Flatt, a rising star in the civil service with eight years’ previous service in Northern Ireland, has since become Private Secretary to the Secretary of State, Alistair Carmichael.

The Secretary of State in February 2013 was Michael Moore MP, who was replaced by fellow Liberal Democrat Carmichael in October that year as the referendum campaign stepped up and it was felt that the office required a more aggressive political lead.

At the Scottish Parliament’s European and External Relations Committee in Holyrood last March, Mr Flatt obligingly told MSPs that he had briefed “dozens” of embassy and other officials of foreign governments.

Alistair Carmichael MP
Alistair Carmichael MP: discomfiture

As this video shows, this was in spite of Carmichael’s clear discomfiture. A similar clip shows that the Secretary of State attempting to silence his official, before bringing the evidence session to a quick end.

According to the Express, the US briefing states: “Scotland Office contacts stressed that this policy paper, more than some others they will release, has an international dimension.

“They suggested the US could be asked by the press if we would recognise the rest of the UK as a legal successor state. (Political officers) recommend we not alter our talking point that the referendum is a domestic political issue.

“If pressed we could say the question of recognition is a hypothetical one, and we don’t engage on hypothetical questions.”

Salmond: "breath of fresh air"
Salmond: “breath of fresh air”

Whatever their political views, US officials appear to have been greatly impressed by the personal abilities of Salmond and Sturgeon. Salmond was described in 2008 as “getting top marks for leadership, intelligence, likeability, guile and the breath of fresh air he is said to be injecting into the government”.

Another report, stemming from a speech to the European Parliament last February, described Sturgeon as “a forceful politician and her presentation impressed even opponents of Scottish independence in the audience”.

US officials clearly kept a close eye on Scottish matters mainly where issues of defence or foreign affairs wre concerned. Despite their reluctance to get involved, President Obama was persuaded eventually to indicate his government’s desire that the UK remain together, although his comments were couched in terms of the final decision being for the Scottish people.

The State Department anticipated that several EU states, led by Spain, may be expected to put obstacles in the way of an independent Scotland, because of concerns about other issues of autonomy on the Continent, and especially Catalonia.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Now it’s time to discard the proferred cloak of paranoia and really understand the powers that were wrought against our democratic rights – with cheer-leading by the ‘Scottish Office’ no less. What’s not to understand?

  2. Well, who knew?

    Of course they lobbied the American govt. for aid and just about any other state they could apply leverage to or call in favours from. The thought that HMG or the establishment would stay clear of Scotland’s referendum was laughable from day one. The rhetoric surrounding the Edinburgh agreement of a debate for ‘Scots alone’ was just that, rhetoric.

    Scotland’s natural resources, its strategic location and Trident were always going to warrant very special attention from those with a direct interest in the outcome. The American govt., much to its own shame would even sacrifice its own historic stand on self determination quite publicly to further safeguard its own interests in our wee corner of the globe.

    An American president asking for continued political unity between the nations of a state entity from which his own nation fought a bloody war to forge its own independence. A president representing a country which has built a historic legend of this piece of history which is celebrated every single year on July 4th.

    I’m sure more than one past president must be spinning in his grave at what the current incumbent of the post was willing to sacrifice in the name of geo politics. July 4th will now perhaps be known as Separation Day?

  3. Thanks for that good article. My Daughter lives in California and probably did not believe me when I told her about the USA,s involvement in the Referendum. I have sent her your article.

  4. The all powerful Westminster political system afraid of a fully democratic process in Scotland, invoking the assistance of foreign governments!
    Afraid of a grass roots democratic peaceful movement. Says it all really.
    Project Fear right enough.

  5. What hurts the most is that some people still think it was a fair and democratic referendum. When the evidence shows of state sponsored fear mongering,gerrymandering and international collaboration. The dice was loaded from the start against Scotland. That’s why we can only achieve independence now without a referendum. We have to construct a situation where Scotland becomes ungovernable. That construct is an SNP landslide at Westminster. Things will get so bad for them that they will persuade us to leave so they can govern the RUK.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here