Information is power



This image from Scotland In Union’s Twitter page with its Robert Burns quote is saturated with irony as the snarling curs of SiU bare their division for all to see

By Russell Bruce

As the dying embers of 2017 smouldered gracefully to a quiet end the flames were fanned to life with revelations leaked to Stu Campbell of Wings and Bella Caledonian. The Elite were behind a campaigning organisation called Scotland in Union whose purpose is to keep Scotland in the union and permanently tied to the wishes of the high and mighty, influential and wealthy.

This all unionist party campaign was formed and brought to life by those whose natural political position was to the right and dominated by Conservative unionist values. A sprinkling of LibDems and Labour figures would be useful as a fig leaf for an agenda entirely financed by the Elite.

That the party of Keir Hardy should be comfortable providing leadership, at least in name, surprises nobody but what little has emerged in published form confirms Scotland in Union is dedicated to the vested interests of the few, not the many. Lib Dems tacking along is a bit less of a surprise.

Graeme Pearson, a former Labour list MSP for the South of Scotland and a retired police officer, was appointed as Chief Executive of Scotland in Union at £50,000 a year for one and a half days a week, according to the Sunday Herald.

Pearson had let his membership of the Labour party lapse in January 2017 explaining he could not support Corbyn as leader. On 23rd January 2017 Scotland in Union issued a press release announcing Pearson’s appointment as Chief Executive. Connected, coincidence?

Pearson said: “Like most people, I hoped the decisive result in the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence would be the end of the division and uncertainty created by our constitutional debate. Regrettably, the nationalists have refused to take no for an answer, and are now using the Brexit decision as a new grievance, despite the fact Scotland clearly doesn’t want another referendum.”

When things change, political objectives change as the SNP made clear. Pearson is of the ilk that no matter the disadvantage or the overriding of Scottish opinion on EU membership, the continuation of an increasingly uncomfortable union comes above all else. The strong evidence that many do want another referendum is clear, yet the Tories and SiU managed to swing unionist opinion behind Scottish Tory candidates in Theresa May’s otherwise disastrous June election.

For seven months Pearson worked on day-to-day campaign planning for Scotland in Union. By August, former Labour MP for Airdrie and Shotts, Pamela Nash, replaced Pearson as the new Chief Executive. Pearson has remained on the SiU board. Nash said on her appointment – well nothing different from Pearson.

In a democracy it is perfectly legitimate for individuals to come together on an issue they agree on. The surprise is Labour politicians are so willing to place themselves under a Tory masterminded campaign. Perhaps the feeling of being disadvantaged electorally by working alongside Tories in the Tory funded Better Together campaign has dissipated. The claim they like using Tory money does not wash. Accepting a favour from the Mafia does not ensure you are distanced from the breadth of their intention.

If you sup with the Deil be not surprised if he is eating your devilled kidneys for breakfast

“And in kirk-yards renew their leagues,

Owre howit dead.”

Organisations, understandably, do not want their financial information leaked

Yet it does happen and the public is keen to hear the gory details. Some donors to SiU are upset, others do not care who knows. By contacting the named individuals, Stu Campbell got the second confirmation source lawyers thought advisable, thus ensuring high journalism standards.

A communication to Wings from a practice of high profile specialist media lawyers  acted as a third confirmation that genuine and inconvenient information had been ‘leaked’.

Political donations over £7,500 must be declared to the Electoral Commission. With a number of donations, reportedly of £7,499,  Scotland in Union expected to keep these donors out of the public spotlight. I have been unable to find any notification from SiU to the Electoral Commission for the three years they have been actively campaigning.

As an incorporated body, a company limited by guarantee, SiU need to submit accounts. The details they have to provide give very little information as their size makes them exempt from lodging full accounts under section 477 of the Companies Act 2006. Their financial year ends on 30 November. At 30th November 2015 they reported retained funds of £91,362. A year later the value of accumulated funds held had risen to £313,283. There are no accounts filed for the year ending 30th November 2017. They have until August this year to file these.

Business for Scotland reports similar limited accounting information under section 477. BfS had £1066 in reserves at 31st Dec 2015 and £1730 at 31st Dec 2016.

There is an argument that lobbying groups and organisations set up to promote political ideas should not be exempted under section 477 of the 2006 Companies Act on account of small turnover. There is also an argument that anybody donating below the notifiable limit should have to attest there are no other political donations that would take them over the limit. Donations to different bodies with the same, or similar objectives, should be aggregated for the purposes of transparency to place all parties on the same footing.

With wealthy benefactors, beyond that of other parties, the Tories have the capacity to set up as many campaigning groups as suit their needs in influencing the media and electorate.

Tories in disunity

The May government is at sixes and sevens. The EU referendum campaign and Brexit vote ruptured any sense this is a party at ease with itself or in accordance on the major issues of the day. The longevity of such administrations is constantly in doubt.

Against the odds May has survived, to perhaps see another Christmas in Downing Street. The one thing Tories are united on is another general election should be avoided. A leadership change, no matter how adroitly handled, could bring another election in its wake. Tories cling to power at all costs because they are going to make a success mess of Brexit.

The Scotland in Union fiasco is the first real evidence all is not well in Tory Scotlandshire. Although Scotland is overwhelmingly in favour of staying in the EU, a hard core of Scottish Tory leavers seems to have waltzed off to UK Unity, upset at how SiU inefficiently was run.

This dissention paints Ruth Davidson’s Tory cabal in the same fractious and disunited state as their southern fellow travellers. For landowners, wealthy unionists and crowds of Anglo Scottish aristocrats it must be tough watching their loose change being paid to former Labour elected members to front Scotland in Union.

Don’t be surprised if SiU suddenly gets shut down for the embarrassment heaped upon those in high places.

Information is power but you have to keep it safe or the manicured lawn becomes infested with molehills only suitable for a crop of leaks.

Where would we be as journalists without the Wiki leaks, the Paradise Papers, Ministers with open notebooks as they walk into No 10 and Scotland in Union? The public would never learn where power and influence really lie.


  1. This story has been out now for 3 days and, as far as I can see, none of this has been reported to date in either of the two largest dailies in Scotland (Herald & Scotsman). I wonder why?

  2. duncanio

    SiU were liberally fluffed by the press and TV, they are now an embarrassment so will perish unsung and unloved. It looks like an internal mercy killing too so they dynamics within Unionism are obviously evolving. I think the Conservatives rather like the Pro-Brexit Ulsterisation they are trying to ferment and they want to clear out those not on message. This may favour the Conservatives initially but I think will ultimately relegate Unionism to dustbin.

  3. I have got to laugh at the premise touted by Pearson, Davidson, Rennie etc that they imagine they speak for Scotland. They speak for Westminster pure and simple. Scotland spoke in the last Riggerendum. The yoons are shitting themselves cos they know the next Referendum will be won by the civic, inclusive, social, Nationalists. Nationalism totally the opposite of British Nationalism. Saor Alba

  4. When your strong for has tripped-up you must act without fear or favour in taking advantage. The full names and amounts should be published and damn the legal consequences. The public must be made aware of how they are being manipulated.

  5. I think shutting down and relaunching under another name is likely. The actual operational personnel is relatively small and the msm will continue to give them space and airtime, so this can be achieved relatively easily.

    The fact that the msm has not reported this means that a substantial proportion of the population is unaware that a couple of ferrets are fighting in a sack. So, it is up to us to use social media and websites like this to make more people aware of how they are being manipulated by a few wealthy people, asserting that they are ‘grassroots’ and ‘mass’. The fact that so many Labour figures are willingly complicit and financially benefitting from association, should be of interest to potential Labour voters.

  6. O/T BBC Radio Shortbread John Beattie’s show interviewed Alyson Pollock (Health Economist) . . . Stated several times that England’s NHS is in a terrible state compared to Scotland’s . . . . . England abolished their NHS in a 2012 Westminister Bill . . . pushing the myth that pensioners are a ticking time bomb is a con, it’s a decision for politicians to make whether they are prepared to fund the system . . . . The NHS was established when the country was on its knees after WW2 so if that was possible looking after OAP’s today is also possible.

    After this John Beattie read out a text . . . It went something like this . . . . . It’s wrong to compare Scotland with England, we should compare Scotland with the best in the World. It’s Seperatist trick/con to compare Scotland with England . . . . The new fake news.

    • Prof Pollock is highly thought of and her views well known.

      Behind the 2012 Westminster Bill is a procurement process that ensures the NHS in England is fast moving from a public service, free at the point of care to a fee-paying model.

      But let’s be blunt, its not only the tories, labour under Blair and Brown started the privatisation processes in England along with the disastrous PFI. Leonard and Findlay need to be reminded of this!

      This week’s announcement by Hunt and May cancelling all non urgent operations for the whole January across England are designed to push patients with money down the private route. Very cynical, but the press has yet to jump on the root cause of this policy, i.e. who decided it!

      RE Clydebuilt’s point, question to John Beattie should be, “Why would Scots not judge where our NHS stands by benchmarking it against a similar organisation?”

      To compare Scotland’s BHS with US, Germany or Australian healthcare systems is like comparing apples and oranges.

      Lesson learned for Scots this week should be to look at how the politicians running the uk are prepared to use vulnerability of elderly and sick to push their right wing agenda and contrasted that with how the NHS is run in Scotland.

      Where Scotland will loose out is when direct spending is reduced in England on NHS public services and the private sector takes over. The Barnett formula to Scotland will similarly be reduced, forcing Scotland down……………

  7. We should be doing both – comparing our NHS with NHS England to show what can be done, albeit on a smaller scale – and also comparing ourselves to the best in the world – we can always learn from others as they can from us. Of course our NHS in Scotland isn’t perfect – it badly needs to overhaul its administrative capabilities for example – but it’s consistently producing miracles out of a hat on the medical and care side of things – which is its overriding function.

  8. “The surprise is Labour politicians are so willing to place themselves under a Tory masterminded campaign. ”

    Hi Russell, this is absolutely no suprise, it’s the norm and to be expected, I would be astonished if there wasn’t labour weasels doing the tories work for them.

    This is the way colonialism works, divide and rule by the imported landed classes employing local henchmen.

    Those from labour in Scotland happy to take wages from anglo absentee landlords are the lowest of the low and a very bright light should be shone on their anti – Scottish and anti – democratic activities.

  9. The great socialist British labor party which i used to vote for;The great Harold Wilson hiding , Scotlands oil wealth. Then we have the great labor pair Tony Blair&Browntrasaurus signing over the sovereign kingdom of Scotlands east coast to England and Elizabeth the second of England signing it as well ! She has just abdicated as queen of Scots.Then everything else Scottish that the English can find to sell to anyone, even although it does not belong to them. They will have a lot to answer for when we get our independence back.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here